Our work

There are over half a million medical devices available on the UK and European markets, covering everything from in vitro diagnostic devices, surgical instruments and implants to contact lenses and wheelchairs. With recent regulatory changes – the introduction of the UKCA mark in Great Britain and the Medical Devices Regulation coming into force in Europe – companies are faced with a daunting task to ensure continuing compliance. Thanks to our extensive expertise in medical device toxicology, and close partnerships with analytical and testing laboratories and regulatory experts, we are the ideal partner for assessing the safety of your medical devices.

Biocompatibility of medical devices

The basis for the biological evaluation of medical devices is the ISO 10993 family of international standards. This provides a framework for the chemical characterisation, biological testing and toxicological risk assessment (TRA) of medical devices. We are experts at conducting biocompatibility assessments concerning medical devices, reviewing new or existing test data and conducting TRAs (in line with ISO 10993-17) based on analytical studies. Using the ISO standards and other guidance published by regulators including the US FDA and European Commission, we can provide an evaluation of the full range of endpoints required.

Extractables and Leachables

The health risk assessment of extractable or leachable chemicals that can migrate from medical devices (and subsequently reach the patient) is critical part of establishing biological safety. Within the ISO 10993 framework, extractables and leachables (chemical characterisation) studies play a critical role in understanding the composition of a medical device.
 

Change Control

When a single component of a medical device undergoes a change – for example, a different source of a raw materials – it is necessary to evaluate the impact this will have on patient safety. We are very experienced in carrying out the sort of comparative assessments and concluding on their bioequivalence.

Our Expertise

Our team has been at the forefront of the medical device E&L sector for many years. Pete Watts, one of our Toxicology Directors, and Senior Toxicologist, Chris Waine, are regular presenters at E&L conferences. Chris is also an expert member of the BSI and ISO committees developing the 10993 series of standards for the biological evaluation of medical devices, including E&Ls testing and toxicological risk assessment - read more about the newly released International Standard ISO 10993-17 in our blog post.

Our expertise in this area

Hazard Characterisation

Our hazard assessments, generally based on in-depth searches of the scientific literature, aim to define the dose-response for all routes of each of a chemical’s toxicological propensities.

Risk Assessment

Our health risk assessments convert the toxicological hazard profile to a health-based guidance value, and compare this reference point to an estimate of human exposure.

Testing Strategies

We can offer advice on the practicalities of designing a testing programme and will support you from approving the protocols to reviewing the final reports.

Some of our case studies in this area

Literature monitoring and hazard characterisation for food supplements

Case study

The client was interested in the potential adverse and beneficial effects of a number of ingredients found in food supplements and other ingested consumer products. In addition to the assessment of some defined chemical substances, the ingredients under investigation included several plant and mushroom extracts along with their key constituents.

Toxicology and Regulatory News May 2026: Top 5 Takeaways

Blog articles

18 May 2026

Stay up to date with the biggest takeaways from toxicology news in May 2026, including the EC’s evaluation of the Tobacco Products Directive and investigations into ethylene glycol’s developmental and reproductive toxicity.

Bisphenol A (BPA) Controversy

Blog articles

It is a truth not always recognised that toxicological hazard and risk assessment as currently practiced is a ball-park science, and a health criteria value – a Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI), a Permitted Daily Exposure (PDE) or similar – quoted to 2 significant figures is probably one significant figure more than the data really can confidently support. Occasionally practitioners will let the mask slip...

About 3

Let's chat.
Tell us how we can help.

Contact us